Friday, October 30, 2009

Is Chinatown a film noir?


            While watching Roman Polanski’s Chinatown, I kept on going back and forth on whether or not it qualifies as a “film noir.”  It has several key aspects of the noir, but also lacks others and obviously was not made in the post-WWII era.

            In John G. Calweti’s “Chinatown and Generic Transformation,” he attacks the same problem that I do.  Calweti says that “there is something not quite right” about the mood generated in Chinatown, the color.  I completely agree with this assessment.  When I think of a film noir, the first things that come to my mind are black and white, darkness and night.  For instance, Alfred Hitchcock utilizes shadows in his film noir Vertigo as does Edgar Ulmer in his film noir Detour.  Seeing a movie where so many scenes are shot in daylight and feature “rich golden light” throws off the viewer.  Calweti argues that these scenes are insignificant, or “outside the world of the hard-boiled detective story.”  In some cases I agree; however, often Jack Nicholson’s character J.J. Gittes does his investigating in broad daylight.  For instance, when Gittes discovers the Noah Cross’ glasses in Evelyn Mulwray’s backyard, it is sunny outside.  This discovery is crucial to the investigation of Hollis Mulwray’s death, and proves to be the piece of evidence that convinces Gittes that Noah Cross murdered Hollis.


            Calweti states that one of the most important factors in film noir is that the protagonist is a “private investigator who occupies a marginal position with respect to the official social institution.”  These are all completely accurate characteristics of J.J. Gittes, Polanski’s protagonist.  Also, Gittes seems to be in over his head, another common element of a film noir. 

Heroes in classical Hollywood cinema are “smooth,” can save the day, and get the girl. Typical Hollywood heroes include James Bond and Indiana Jones.  They always win the fights, save the innocent bystanders, and have the charisma to win over anybody.  Gittes is the anti-hero with regards to all of these.  Gittes is not witty as shown by his telling of the Chinese joke.  Also, he is caught doing investigation early on, and his nose is cut.  While Gittes is walking around the whole movie with a large bandage covering his nose, it may be difficult for people (the audience included) to take him seriously.  When all is said and done, the girl dies and the guilty walks free, thus showing that Gittes was in over his head and did not “save the day.”

            Another recurring theme in film noirs is the dangerous woman, or the “feminine antagonist.”  For the first portion of Chinatown, the audience believes that Ida Sessions is the antagonist.  Sessions poses as Evelyn Mulwray and asks Gittes to follow Hollis Mulwray.  Thus, Sessions is the reason why Gittes follows Hollis Mulwray in the first place.  As the plot develops, it is shown that Evelyn Mulwray is the antagonist.  Although she is not the murderer, she lies to Gittes on several occasions, and she also hides, sometimes forcefully, her “daughter-sister” Katherine Cross.  At first glance Evelyn may seem to be innocent and have good intent (unlike Vera in Detour), it is clear when we see her holding Katherine that she is just looking out for herself rather than looking for justice.

Though Polanski often veers from the noir mood, it is clear that Polanski wanted the final scene to be shot in the mood of the noir.  He succeeds in doing so.  In Chinatown, it is nighttime and the audience is reminded of the corruption that is clear in the film.  After Lieutenant Escobar witness the murder of Evelyn Mulwray, and Gittes explains Noah Cross’ corruption in the Los Angeles Water Supply, Escobar fails to arrest Cross, and it is even implied that he will not follow up on any leads.  When Gittes mutters “as little as possible,” to Escobar, he is reminding both Escobar and the audience that corruption is a recurring theme in the film.  This brings the film full circle in the noir theme.  Calweti writes that in most film noirs “the police and the courts are incapable of effectively protecting the innocent bringing the guilty to appropriate justice.”  This is clear in Evelyn’s death and Noah Cross’ freedom.


It is also worth nothing, that traditional film noirs have dark, solemn moods, but Chinatown incorporates several comical scenes.  Though none of the characters laugh at Gittes’ Chinaman joke, the audience finds humor in it.  Gittes also makes other witty remarks throughout the film.  When he is eating with Noah Cross and the fish is served with their heads still on, Gittes remarks “Fine…long as you don’t serve the chicken that way.”  In most of the film noirs I have seen, the ominous mood dominates so much that I cannot recall any witty or humorous remarks.

Even if it is very difficult for me to accept a film with so much light and color as a film noir, I think Chinatown has enough key elements that it should be considered a film noir.  Its final scene and specifically the results of it, lead me to believe that Chinatown embodies even elements of the noir mood for it to be considered a film noir.

8 comments:

  1. I’m glad that someone decided to take on Chinatown. I’ve been struggling with this idea myself, is Chinatown a noir? I think you have made some really interesting readings of both Calweti and Chinatown and you certainly make a case for the film to be a noir, so I think you have succeeded in your purpose. I have to say though, that in reading your blog and thinking about it myself, I don’t really agree with your conclusion. I would agree that there are definite elements of noir in the film, however, I don’t ultimately agree with the idea that this is a straight-up noir. I think Polanski uses the parts of the noir he wants and gets rid of the rest, leaving us with a feeling that this movie is familiar, but very much new and stand-alone. I think your first insight about the film makes this clear, how can you have a noir without having it in black-and-white? I don’t think you can. For me, people lurking in the shadows is the key to a noir and without that the film falls short of the mark. I think it’s a great film, and certainly makes use of noir elements, but it strays too far from the mark. What we have is a great detective story full of twists and turns.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You've identified lots of excellent examples from the film to make your point! I'm wondering... Outside of the realm of the course, is there a way to make this question about whether or not Chinatown is "film noir" relevant? In other words, what does it do for our experience watching the film to know how the film adheres in some ways (but not all) to noir conventions?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your blog does a good job of bringing up the major questions regarding whether or not Chinatown can be considered Noir, but it seems like you never really answered them. Basically, the question that I found myself asking after reading your blog was this: How do you define the Noir? Do you see it as a collection of films having similar thematic elements? Or as films that have a similar aesthetic quality? Or as films that all share a similar mood? You seem to bounce back and forth with your blog. You mention that Chinatown shares many of the themes that other Noir films have, but then in the previous paragraph, you mention its lack of use of shadow as an example of its unNoirness. And then you seem to find the mood as also very important. Perhaps for you the Noir is the combination or all three?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I, like Carrie, have been trying to figure out whether or not China Town should be considered a film noir. Based on the examples you gave Matt, I have to say that it is. There are many difference between this film and a typical film noir, as have been pointed out in this blog. However, I believe that these represent an evolution of the genre (Is it a genre? I still think so.), not a divergence from it.
    Though some of the stylistic aspects have changed, the overarching themes remain the same, which I feel is the most important aspect of any genre.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Despite Chinatown's use of color, which in some cases the color is still muted suggesting a darker mood, Chinatown is the resurrection of film noir. It is not film noir itself, for the genre corresponds to a specific time period and a historic sense of disillusionment, but it is made with the style and theme of film noir in mind. It is a neo noir taking elements such as the imperfect private invesitgator and a general ineptitude of the law. I felt, however, that Jack Nicholson's character was more competent than say Robert Downey Junior's character in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Nicholson's character did not inspire so much blatant humor as he represented the limitations of the private invesitgator role, yet this realism aids its categorization as part of the noir.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with you that Chinatown doesn't adhere to every noir convention. The question then becomes, are there enough conventions to consider it overall a noir? I don't think so. The comical scenes really throw me off. I've never seen Jack Nicholson play a completely serious role, and it's quite possible I never will. He's just not suave hero type.
    The lighting, the unsatisfactory, ending etc etc are all good points!

    I'm sorry all my comments have been short..like I said before I'm out of town and have limited time access to the computer. Also, I'm sick.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think in some ways Chinatown's humor does represent an extension of the noir genre. In many classic noir films, the dialogue verges on the edge of the comical - at least to modern audiences. The rapid fire back and forth at times can become too intense to be serious. The intentional humor in Chinatown could be an evolution of this conceit, although it is uncertain whether or not any of the comedy of classic noir would have appeared as such to period audiences.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Like you, I really believe that Chinatown is a film noir. Its true that the form of the film does include a lot of light, but its done in such a way that included highly contrasted shadows. Even in form, the high contrast of light and dark in the movie gave me the idea that it still followed in the artistic form of the film noir. The overall dark and dangerous tone of the movie was also highly reflective of the film noir genre as you mention. The protagonist does not end up saving the day--and the corrupt society comes out on top, no matter how Gittes tries to combat the injustice of it. The whole film is also set up as a mystery, clues slowly reveal themselves and we as the active audience attempts to solve the mystery along with Gittes.

    ReplyDelete